User talk:Bohemian Baltimore

A barnstar for your efforts

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thank you for your continued service adding to Wikipedia throughout 2020. - Cdjp1 (talk) 13:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

A well-deserved award

		The Maryland Barnstar
		For your dedication to Maryland-related articles. I appreciate your help on Islam in Maryland :) —  Melofors  TC 22:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		What a fantastic surprise to wake up to new categories on so many articles I started! Thank you – and I'll try my best to improve my categorization skills and pay it forward ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 17:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Right to sit

On 12 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Right to sit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that workers have the right to sit in some jurisdictions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Right to sit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Right to sit), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your work on Improving and creating Jewish articles Skullovitch (talk) 17:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Bohemian Baltimore!

Happy New Year!

Bohemian Baltimore,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions on Judaism, Israel, Palestine, and Queerness in Baltimore! BMORE PRIDE!!! Ecco2kstan (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Working on Draft:Antisemitism in Mexico

Hello there, I began a new draft, Draft: Antisemitism in Mexico, after seeing the idea on your page. I would really appreciate your input on the page, as you've written a lot about Jewish topics, and have made many "Antisemitism in..." pages. Jaguarnik (talk) 20:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Jewish tartan

On 13 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jewish tartan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jewish tartans have been made for the Jewish community of Scotland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jewish tartans. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jewish tartan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 21,860 views (910.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Pro-Israel --> Zionist

The two aren't interchangeable. For one thing, RS do not use the two terms interchangeably, almost exclusively preferring "pro-Israel". The redirect should be corrected, perhaps to reflect to Israel lobby or something to that effect, to reflect the differentiation, and to comply with WP:COMMONNAME. Longhornsg (talk) 06:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

@Longhornsg Thanks for the comment. I'm not seeing the distinction, but it is a discussion worth having, as both terms appear frequently in print. I would recommend a broader community discussion over this before the redirect is charged, to invite other perspectives. Perhaps the distinction between "Zionist" and "pro-Zionist" can also be poked at. My main caution is that we must be vigilant to not endorse a view which construes Zionism and Zionists as automatically Jewish and "pro-Zionists" and being "pro-Israel" as automatically non-Jewish, as that would be inaccurate and in my view antisemitic. Perhaps some people use "pro-Israel" because they might perceive "Zionist" as having a more negative connotation. Why proud Zionists wouldn't champion the term, I don't know. Maybe as PR. Is there scholarly discussion about these terminological distinctions? Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 08:06, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

@Bohemian Baltimore @Longhornsg

I don't know what is the background to this discussion, but as for the distinction between "Pro-Israel" and "Zionist", in my opinion it is simple.

Zionism is the ideology that Jews have the right of self-determination in (all or part) of their historical homeland. Anyone who subscribe to this view is therefore a Zionist. Pro-Israeli is someone who likes and supports Israel and maybe even acts or speaks in her favor.

This means that the set of "Pro-Israelis" is a subset of the set of "Zionists". That is anyone who is pro-Israeli is necessarily a Zionist, for it's quite impossible to love and support a state without believing that it has a right to exist. But you can be a Zionist and not be pro-Israeli, if you believe that it has a right to exist but are indifferent to it beyond that. For example I definitely think that Uruguay has a right to exist, but otherwise I'm quite indifferent to it. One can have a similar view on Israel. Vegan416 (talk) 20:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tunisian people of Bosniak descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Tunisian people of Bosniak descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Indigenous languages of Europe has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indigenous languages of Europe has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 15:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thanks for all you do but especially your new article! Yuchitown (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Accessible Montreal Metro stations has been nominated for deletion

Category:Accessible Montreal Metro stations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 14:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:American people who self-identify as being of Lipan_Apache descent

Hello, Bohemian Baltimore,

I thought I'd let you know that this category has been tagged for speedy deletion. But the way it was tagged, I guessed you would not have received a notification about it. I think it would be worth a minute of your time to go see the deletion rationale accompanying the tagging to consider whether or not this category is appropriate for the project. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pueblo of San Ildefonso, New Mexico

A tag has been placed on Category:Pueblo of San Ildefonso, New Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:American people who self-identify as being of Abenaki descent

Really appreciated finding this page. I am a scholar in Vermont that works with Abenaki and other scholars specifically on this issue. Would love to collaborate / share info / support this page but have never been on the back end of Wikipedia Mr. Scholaris Vulgaris (talk) 18:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Donald Edmond Pelotte. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cabayi (talk) 11:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

@Cabayi Thanks. I left a message on the talk page. The IP user has continued to edit and has not responded. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I have alerted the offended party to the discussion. Cabayi (talk) 22:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Articles on ANCSA village entities

Almost every article I've spot-checked so far is a blatant WP:NOTDIR violation. Do you honestly suppose other editors are going to come along and fill in that content? Based on past experience, it's highly doubtful that will happen anytime soon. Also, almost all of the accompanying categories run afoul of WP:CATDEF; as such, they also run afoul of WP:EPON. Let me know what help you require in straightening that out before someone comes along and nominates it all for deletion. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 23:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

@RadioKAOS These are federally recognized tribes. I think your tone is unnecessarily scornful. What makes you think I'm not going to add more to the articles, or haven't already? Almost all of them were created recently. Over the last few months, I've begun to create and add more information on Alaska Native tribes. Previously, I've edited and created articles on Native American tribes in the contiguous USA for the last several years. I'll try to add more to the existing articles on federally recognized tribes before I create any more. Take care. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:White nationalism in France has been nominated for merging

Category:White nationalism in France has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American people who self-identify as being of Lipan Apache descent

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:American people who self-identify as being of Lipan Apache descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daringsmith (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Indigenist political parties in the Americas has been nominated for merging

Category:Indigenist political parties in the Americas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

CFD discussion re Category:Native American people from the San Francisco Bay Area

Hey there. I thought you might like to take a look at the CFD discussion that is under way. I initially refrained from inviting your participation, but after further reflection, I feel that you should be afforded the opportunity to share your views, given how closely related this category is to Category:Native Americans in the San Francisco Bay Area, which you created a few years back. Although I surmise that Category:Native American people from the San Francisco Bay Area (which I created) must have escaped your notice at the time! :) Regards, Anomalous+0 (talk) 00:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 6 § Category:Anti-Armenianism

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 6 § Category:Anti-Armenianism on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 10:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Category:Afro-Indigenous has been nominated for renaming to Category:Afro-Indigenous peoples of the Americas

Category:Afro-Indigenous has been nominated for renaming to Category:Afro-Indigenous peoples of the Americas. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 10:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People of West Asian-Jewish descent

A tag has been placed on Category:People of West Asian-Jewish descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Bohemian Baltimore!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Category:Arab-Jewish culture in the United States has been nominated for merging

Category:Arab-Jewish culture in the United States has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Chicana

Thank you for your suggested edits on the page for Chicana Feminism! As I read the page I also noticed it was entrenched in white gaze and completely dismissed the hardships and violence women came to face in this movement. Thank you! Violetviola3 (talk) 20:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Violetviola3

Category:LGBT people by sexual orientation has been nominated for merging

Category:LGBT people by sexual orientation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH ^talk! 02:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Christian anti-Zionism has been nominated for deletion

Category:Christian anti-Zionism has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Eastern Europe in fiction has been nominated for merging

Category:Eastern Europe in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 09:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Eastern European diaspora in the United States has been nominated for merging

Category:Eastern European diaspora in the United States has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 09:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Aromanticism and Asexuality are the A of LGBTQIA+ and Intersex is the I and is inherently an LGBTQIA+ identity

You recently made an erroneous new group of categories that misrepresent certain identities on the LGBTQIA+ community. Aromanticism, Asexuality and Intersex are inherently part of the LGBTQIA+ community and are not separate.

Please undo all the changes you have made with this regard as they are incorrect and misrepresent these identities. The reason why Wikipedia uses LGBT to identity the entirety of the LGBTQIA+ community is a separate topic, of which we have regular discussions for renaming, but it doesn't change the fact that other queer identities are part of it and should not be othered out.

Aromanticism is also NOT a subcategory of Asexuality as you erroneously changed here - please stop this editing immediately and undo all these wrong changes.

I recommend you seek guidance at Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies before making any further of these sweeping changes. Raladic (talk) 16:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

@Raladic They are not erroneous as LGBT intersex people and LGBT asexuals people exist. There are plenty of intersex people who identify as cisgender heterosexuals and plenty of asexuals who identify as cis/heteroromantic or straight. Being a gay asexual or a trans asexual or an intersex lesbian is a meaningful intersection of two oppressed groups, a minority within a minority. The changes have already been undone by other editors. But I insist that to erase and eradicate the specificity of queer asexuals and queer intersex people is both deeply homophobic and transphobic. Perhaps not in intent, but certainly in the result. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 10:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Your error stems from the misunderstanding that is how we consider LGBT as encompassng all parts of the LGBTQIA+ umbrella per current Wikipedia consensus. It just hasn't been renamed because consensus for what to rename it to (LGBT vs LGBTQ vs LGBTQ+ and so on) has been difficult (you can find a whole lot of history of rename discussions at LGBT).

Since Asexual, Aromantic and and Intersex are inherently part of that community umbrella, it is redundant to say that someone who is Asexual is also LGBTQIA+ with a different category, hence the categories you created misrepresent this and imply that they were not already part of the umbrella by othering them out. Raladic (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LGBT aromantic people

A tag has been placed on Category:LGBT aromantic people, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• The category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Raladic (talk) 16:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Conservative Judaism in the United Kingdom has been nominated for discussion

Category:Conservative Judaism in the United Kingdom has been nominated for possible renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Headhitter (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Pansexuality is not the same as bisexuality

I've reverted your category changes. You can be pansexual and not bisexual. Bisexuality is about attracted to multiple genders, while pansexuality is about being attracted to all genders. Mason (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

@Smasongarrison Bisexuality was already the parent category for pansexuality. I merely made the subcats match. As you said, bisexuality is attraction to two or more genders. That's the widely accepted term in that community. Thus, pansexuality is part of the bi umbrella. But it seems like as usual, Wikipedia is woefully behind the times. There are a score of terms like omnisexual, polysexual, plurisexual, multisexual. All of those terms fit comfortably under the bi+ umbrella. It makes zero sense to have multiple scattershot categories that serve to detract from navigability rather than help. That's why identities like genderfluid, genderqueer, etc are placed as subcategories of "non-binary" on Wikipedia. It simply makes sense in terms of navigation of content. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 10:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

these are not the same. All genders is not the same as multiple genders. Mason (talk) 12:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@Smasongarrison It falls under the same umbrella because "all genders" are "two or more genders". All is more than two. This is a common understanding, not something I invented. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 17:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

You placed pansexuality as being nested within of bisexual, which is the opposite of what you are saying here. Regardless, my point is that your interpretation of what "makes sense" is not in line with how many others view these nested structures. Mason (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@Smasongarrison I placed the pan biographical categories within the bi biographical categories as subcats, matching the fact that the category for pansexuality was already a subcat of bisexuality. I simply made the categorization consistent. Not all bi people are pansexual, but pansexuality falls under the bi+ umbrella. Here's an example of this very common definition from bi.org: "Terms that fall under the bi umbrella include pansexual (attraction to all genders, with a political emphasis on trans and non-binary gender identities), polysexual and multisexual (attraction to multiple sexes), and omnisexual (attraction to all sexes)." The Human Rights Commission, citing the leading bi activist Robyn Ochs, states that a "broad definition of bisexuality includes people who identify as pansexual, queer, fluid and other labels that suggest potential attraction to more than one gender." This is a mainstream definition, but as usual Wikipedia has a molasses-like ability to keep up with language everyone else has been using for the last 10 to 15 years. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 19:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

If you want to change the parent category structure, I recommend you do so through seeking consensus at CFD and a broader RFD. Rather than unilaterally doing so, like you did in this case. Mason (talk) 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@Smasongarrison Not unilaterally, as some of the pansexual categories were already subcats of bi categories. But I can certainly do that. I'm unaware of any written consensus supporting the opposite, in deletion/merging discussions or LGBT WikiProject guidelines. Are you? Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

You can pretty clearly see some written consensus in the ongoing discussion. However, I'm not going to do your homework for you. Mason (talk) 22:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@Smasongarrison So then, no, there is no record of any "deletion/merging discussions or LGBT WikiProject guidelines" stating such a consensus. Thanks for the clarification. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 22:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Transgender men by sexual orientation has been nominated for splitting

Category:Transgender men by sexual orientation has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Transgender women by sexual orientation has been nominated for splitting

Category:Transgender women by sexual orientation has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians by sexuality has been nominated for merging

Category:Wikipedians by sexuality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:LGBT intersex people has been nominated for splitting

Category:LGBT intersex people has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:LGBT intersex women has been nominated for splitting

Category:LGBT intersex women has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:LGBT intersex men has been nominated for splitting

Category:LGBT intersex men has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Intersex transgender women has been nominated for splitting

Category:Intersex transgender women has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Intersex transgender men has been nominated for splitting

Category:Intersex transgender men has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Intersex gay men has been nominated for splitting

Category:Intersex gay men has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Intersex transgender people has been nominated for deletion

Category:Intersex transgender people has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Transgender people by sexual orientation has been nominated for merging

Category:Transgender people by sexual orientation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:LGBT asexual people has been nominated for merging

Category:LGBT asexual people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:LGBT asexual men has been nominated for merging

Category:LGBT asexual men has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Asexual gay men has been nominated for splitting

Category:Asexual gay men has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:LGBT demisexual people has been nominated for splitting

Category:LGBT demisexual people has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:12, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:LGBT asexual women has been nominated for merging

Category:LGBT asexual women has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:LGBT aromantic people has been nominated for deletion

Category:LGBT aromantic people has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bannock

A tag has been placed on Category:Bannock indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Intersex lesbians has been nominated for deletion

Category:Intersex lesbians has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH ^talk! 22:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LGBT aromantic people

A tag has been placed on Category:LGBT aromantic people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Flounder fillet (talk) 20:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Saving Category:Intersex transgender people

I'm glad I found someone else who knows about the erasure of intersex people, transgender people and LGBTQ+ people. I also cannot understand why so many people dishonestly want to disprove the fact that there are many overlaps between groups of LGBTQ+ people and non-LGBTQ+ people, whether they are intersex or endosex, cisgender or transgender, binary or non-binary or agender.

I wonder whether we can gather off-wiki support for opposing this deletion? I'm a member of a discord server for LGBTQ+ people (https://discord.gg/gay) and if you want to join it, we can discuss with many people who are more progressive. — CrafterNova ^{[ TALK ] [ CONT ]} 16:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) CrafterNova, please see WP:Canvassing. Contacting a specific set of people offwiki and getting them to express a certain view onwiki goes against Wikipedia's system of consensus decision-making. It's almost always considered disruptive. — ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 17:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

@Ezlev: Alright. I agree, no off-wiki discussions. I still wonder how on-wiki support can be gathered for opposing such deletions, since many users don't want to listen to intersex people who are not LGBTQ+, such as Betsy Driver, Lisa Lee Dark, Sally Gross, Esther Morris Leidolf, Sarah Gronert, Phoebe Hart, Bonnie Hart. — CrafterNova ^{[ TALK ] [ CONT ]} 09:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Western European culture has been nominated for merging

Category:Western European culture has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 08:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:North African Jews

A tag has been placed on Category:North African Jews indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:West Asian Jews

A tag has been placed on Category:West Asian Jews indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)